“VAST is a
computer-controlled, integrated test system composed of independent, general-purpose
stimulus and measurement instruments, referred to as Building Blocks (BBs). The
use of interface devices (ID) enables the station to be adapted for the unique
capabilities of the various components. VAST was a forerunner of modern automatic
test equipment (ATE) such as Consolidated Automated Support System (CASS),
Avionics Test Set (ATS), and Intermediate Avionics Test Set (IATS).” Source
VAST was designed to
support selected avionics from the F-14, the S-3, the A7-E and the E2-C, and
entered the fleet in 1973. After 32
years of service in the fleet, VAST was decommissioned in 2005. The picture below was taken at that ceremony.
About half of a VAST station is shown on the right.
I was in the first wave
of VAST technicians in 1973/1974 that trained at VF-124 (NAS Miramar, CA), and
was subsequently assigned to one of the first two F-14 squadrons on the east
coast (NAS Oceana), and aboard the carrier USS Kennedy.
In theory, the line
techs would remove and replace avionics components to keep the planes in the
air, and send the bad “box” to the VAST shop for diagnostics and repair. After connecting the box to VAST, the
computerized diagnostic program would correctly identify the bad component. The operator would replace the bad component,
repeat the diagnostic program to insure the problem had been fixed, and return
the box to the line for inventory. At
least, that was the plan.
As with all new systems,
there were problems. In this case, both
the F-14 and VAST were new and untested in the fleet, and there were MANY
problems, generally falling into these four categories:
1.
A
component other than the one identified by the program was in fact the problem.
2. The interconnecting devices were faulty.
3. The program was faulty, or
4. There was a problem with the VAST
station itself.
Some troubleshooting
was easy, e.g. if you thought that particular VAST station was bad, or the
interconnecting device was bad, try another station or interconnecting device
setup.
Some troubleshooting
wasn’t so easy. Countless hours were spent
pouring over schematics, manually recreating program steps, re-writing code,
and communicating real world results both to the vendor for future revisions,
and to the fleet for the benefit of other installations. Vendor field engineers were with us on the
first cruise, but it was at all times very much a team effort. To meet the challenge, everyone had to up
their game. Personally, although my
military electronics training was very good, I still thought it worthwhile to
obtain an AA in Computer Engineering Technology and to learn FORTRAN, which I
did.
To be successful, we
had to work smart, work together, and stick with each problem until it was
solved. Lessons learned early on that
have served me well ever since.
What are the
characteristics of good problem solvers?
This list is as good as any.
Moral of the blog: Learning
problem-solving skills always begins with a problem!
No comments:
Post a Comment